World Journal of Nuclear Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 215--221

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in anorectal melanoma


Ajinkya N Bakare1, Archi Agrawal1, Avanish Saklani2, Reena Engineer3, Nilendu Purandare1, Sneha Shah1, Ameya Puranik1, Venkatesh Rangarajan1,  
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Archi Agrawal
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in initial staging and restaging of anorectal melanoma. This was a single-institution, retrospective observational study; patients for initial staging and with clinical or radiological suspicion of disease recurrence referred for PET/CT between January 2006 and December 2015 were included in the study. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT was evaluated for baseline staging and disease recurrence. A total of 61 patients who were referred for initial staging were included. PET/CT correctly detected primary lesion in 57 (93.44%) cases, regional nodes in 46 (75.4%) cases, nonregional nodes in 22 (36%) cases, and distant metastases in 25 (41%) cases. The sensitivity (SN); specificity (SP); positive predictive value (PPV); negative predictive value (NPV); and accuracy for primary lesion, regional nodes, nonregional nodes, and distant metastases were 96.6%, 100%, 100%, 50%, and 96.7%; 97.9%, 100%, 100%, 93.3%, and 98.4%; 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%; and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. A total of 24 patients were included for suspected recurrence/restaging. All the patients were treated previously by surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. PET/CT detected disease recurrence in 20 (83.3%) patients. Ten patients had recurrence at the primary site, 8 of whom also had distant metastases and 2 had only locoregional metastatic nodes. In the remaining 10 patients, there was no primary site recurrence; however, 2 patients had locoregional nodal and distant metastases and 8 patients had only distant metastases. PET/CT was false negative in 1 patient, which missed liver metastasis. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT was found to be 95%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, with accuracy of 96%. PET/CT demonstrates overall high diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging and detection of recurrent disease in cases of anorectal melanoma.



How to cite this article:
Bakare AN, Agrawal A, Saklani A, Engineer R, Purandare N, Shah S, Puranik A, Rangarajan V. Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in anorectal melanoma.World J Nucl Med 2021;20:215-221


How to cite this URL:
Bakare AN, Agrawal A, Saklani A, Engineer R, Purandare N, Shah S, Puranik A, Rangarajan V. Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in anorectal melanoma. World J Nucl Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 15 ];20:215-221
Available from: http://www.wjnm.org/text.asp?2021/20/3/215/324168


Full Text

 Introduction



Melanomas arise from melanocytes, which are derived from embryonic neural crest cells. Anorectal melanoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy and most arises from the dentate line.[1] They account for <1% of all malignant melanomas and fewer than 3% of all anal tumors.[1],[2],[3] The incidence of anorectal melanoma is about 1–2 cases per million population per year in the United States, with statistical estimates in similar range in Europe and Asia.[4] The incidence of anorectal melanoma is thought to be increasing.[4] Most of the patients present with nonspecific symptoms and as a result tend to have disease progression to advanced stage at initial presentation.[1] The overall risk factors for anorectal melanoma are also poorly known. The relationship between cutaneous melanoma and ultraviolet B light, which is a carcinogenic stimulus, is well documented.[5] However, it is not obvious what triggers the development of anal melanoma as anal mucosa is never exposed to sunlight. As with cutaneous melanomas, which are 20 times more common in whites than blacks, there is no such evidence for anal melanomas.[3] Tumor stage is an independent prognostic variable for overall survival. However, there are no well-established staging systems and treatment protocols due to its rarity. Siegal et al. reported that survival for Stage I patients (local disease) was 48 months, Stage II (local disease with regional nodes) was 12 months, and Stage III (distant metastases) was 10 months.[6] Thus, it is important to have accurate imaging modality for staging anorectal melanoma. The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in staging and restaging of several cancers has already been established. The literature regarding the role of PET/CT in anorectal melanoma is sparse as it is a rare type of tumor. Only few case reports and case series are documented in literature. No studies or any guidelines establishing the role of PET/CT in anorectal melanoma are currently published. The aim of our retrospective audit was to report our experience in evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in staging and restaging of anorectal melanoma.

 Materials and Methods



This was an institutional review board-approved, single-institution, retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients were included. Inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven cases of anorectal melanoma referred for initial staging and for suspected recurrence/restaging who underwent a PET/CT between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients in whom biopsy report was not available or with synchronous malignancy at any other site were excluded from the study. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT was evaluated for baseline staging and restaging with clinical suspicion of recurrence. PET/CT studies were evaluated for the ability to detect the primary disease, nodal, and other sites of metastases. Histopathology was used as gold standard. When tissue diagnosis was not available, clinical or radiological follow-up was used as reference standard. The sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated at 95% confidence interval. At present, as there is no staging system specific to the disease, a clinical staging as suggested by several retrospective studies for mucosal melanomas was used, Stage I as localized disease only and Stage II as regional lymph node (LN) involvement. Nodes in the pelvis below the common iliac were considered locoregional nodes. Disease in nodes from common iliac and above and other organs was Stage III.

Patient preparation and positron emission tomography/computed tomography protocol

All patients were asked to fast for at least 6 h prior to the study and blood glucose levels checked and confirmed to be below 150 mg/dl (8.3 mmol/L). The studies were taken 60 ± 15 min following intravenous administration of 5 MBq/kg body weight of 18F-FDG. Imaging was performed using Philips Gemini TF TOF 16/64 PET/CT scanners (PET crystal-LYSO). After obtaining a scout image, breath-hold CT was acquired followed by whole-body CT and the PET acquisition in the same anatomic location. Whole-body CT was acquired from skull base to midthigh region (slice thickness 2 mm, 120 kV voltage, automated mA, rotation time 0.5 s, pitch 0.83, image matrix 512 × 512, field of view (FOV) 600 mm) without any breath-hold instructions. Separate breath-hold CT was acquired (slice thickness 3 mm, 120 kV, automated mA, pitch 1.08, FOV 300 mm, image matrix 512 × 512) for the evaluation of the lungs. Eighty milliliters of oral contrast was administered in all eligible patients at a rate of 1.8 ml/s and scan delay of 50 s. Water-based oral contrast was given for bowel distension. Contrast-enhanced CT was used for diagnostic purpose as well as for attenuation correction of PET data. PET was acquired in three-dimensional mode in about 5–8 bed positions with an acquisition time of 60–90 s/bed position, axial FOV 576 mm, and in plane spatial resolution of 4 mm.

Image reconstruction and interpretation

The images were reconstructed iteratively using RAMLA algorithm. CT attenuation correction, dead time correction, and decay correction were applied. Images were viewed on Philips workstation having extended brilliance workspace version 4.5.3.40140, equipped with fusion viewer software that enables the display of PET, CT, and fusion PET/CT images.

The images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Any area with intensity greater than background that could not be identified as physiological activity on PET images or which on CT correlation did not fit into benign (infective/inflammatory/degenerative) was considered to be suggestive of tumor on PET/CT study. CT criteria for positive metastatic node included size more than or equal to 1 cm in short-axis measurement, rounded nodes, loss of fatty hilum, central necrosis, and/or contrast enhancement. Morphologic characteristics of pulmonary lesions on CT were taken positive even in the absence of 18F-FDG uptake.

The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary tumor/recurrence and the metastatic lesions was correlated with either histopathology or subsequent clinical/follow-up imaging.

Statistical analysis

All the PET/CT studies were evaluated for the ability to detect the primary disease, nodal, and distant metastatic sites. The SN, SP, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were calculated at 95% confidence interval.

 Results



Initial staging

A total of 61 (45 males and 16 females) patients with an age range of 28–88 years were included for initial staging. Among the 61 patients, 13.1% had Stage I, 29.5% had Stage II, and 57.4% had Stage III at initial presentation. Primary tumor site was localized to anal canal, rectum, and anorectal region [Table 1]. The primary tumor/lesion was detected in 57 patients out of 61. In four patients in whom no lesions were detected, PET/CT was true negative in two and false negative [Figure 1] in the other two patients (SN, 96.6%; SP, 100%; PPV, 100%; NPV, 50%; and accuracy, 96.7%). Regional nodal involvement was correctly detected in 46 out of 61 patients with false negative in one patient (SN, 97.9%; SP, 100%; PPV, 100%; NPV, 93.3%; and accuracy, 98.4%). Histopathological correlation was available for primary and regional nodal disease in all patients [Figure 2]. Twenty-two patients had nonregional nodes positive on PET/CT, whereas distant metastases were detected in 25 patients with SN 100%, SP 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 100% [Figure 3]. These were confirmed with subsequent follow-up imaging [Table 2].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Table 1}{Table 2}

Restaging

A total of 24 (15 males and 9 females) patients were included for suspected recurrence/restaging [Table 3]. All patients underwent surgery. 79.2% (19/24) of patients underwent surgery alone; 16.7% (4/24) of patients were treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy; and 4.2% (1/24) of patients underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. PET/CT detected disease recurrence in 20 (83.3%) patients. Ten patients had recurrence at the primary site [Figure 4], 8 of whom also had distant metastases [Figure 4]a and 2 had only locoregional metastatic nodes. In the remaining 10 patients, there was no primary site recurrence; however, 2 patients had locoregional nodal and distant metastases and 8 patients had only distant metastases. Histopathological confirmation was available in 6 patients, whereas imaging and clinical follow-up confirmed recurrence in the remaining patients. Thus, primary site recurrence was noted in 10 (41.7%) cases, locoregional nodes in 10 (41.7%) cases, and distant metastases in 18 (75%) cases. Liver was the most common site of distant metastases in 45.8% (11/24) of patients, followed by lungs 37.5% (9/24). PET/CT was negative for recurrence in three patients. This was confirmed by follow-up imaging studies in two cases and short-term clinical follow-up in one case. PET/CT was false negative in one patient, which missed liver metastases [Figure 5]. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the liver lesion was done prior to the PET/CT scan, which had revealed metastatic malignant melanoma consistent with known primary in anorectum.{Table 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}

SN, SP, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT was found to be 95%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, with accuracy of 96% [Table 4].{Table 4}

 Discussion



Mucosal melanoma of anorectum is very aggressive disease with extremely poor prognosis with overall 5-year survival rates of 3%–22%.[1],[2],[3] Most of the patients present late because of nonspecific symptoms. Furthermore, majority of the lesions lack obvious pigmentation.[7],[8] Surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for locoregional disease. Despite aggressive local surgical control even in early-stage disease, local and distant site recurrences occur frequently due to its multifocal nature and clinically occult lymphatic spread.

PET, a whole-body metabolic imaging modality, appears ideal for accurate disease status evaluation before undertaking curative resection. Malignant melanoma cells are extremely FDG avid because of the upregulation of glucose transporter proteins, which forms the basis of FDG PET imaging.

Combing anatomical imaging CT with metabolic imaging PET provides the added advantage of anatomical localization and also increases the SN and SP by differentiating pathological uptake from benign/physiological uptake.

Data about FDG PET/CT in anorectal malignant melanoma are sparse. Few case reports and case series are noted in literature.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] Studies in primary cutaneous malignant melanoma have shown the superiority of PET and PET/CT over conventional imaging in initial staging and recurrent disease/restaging.[14],[15],[16],[17]

This study was performed with an aim to calculate the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in initial staging and restaging with suspected recurrence in anorectal melanoma.

Patients for initial staging were treatment naïve and for recurrence had previously undergone surgical resection, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

In the initial staging group, primary lesion was correctly identified in 57 patients out of 61. In two patients, primary lesion was not evident on the scan of whom the surgical specimen was positive. In both cases, the thickness of the primary lesion was of about less than one centimeter size. This shows that small submucosal lesions may be missed on FDG PET. Regional nodal metastases were correctly identified in 46 (75.5%) patients. PET/CT was true negative in 14 (23%) patients and false negative in one patient. Postsurgery histopathology was positive for nodal metastases. Although PET is the best modality to detect metastases in subcentimeter size nodes, no imaging modality has yet proven accurate for the detection of micrometastases. This remains a drawback of imaging. However, of all imaging modalities, FDG PET/CT has still the best results.

Thus, in our study, PET/CT demonstrated high SN, SP, and accuracy for the detection of primary tumor and locoregional nodes. The primary lesions and nodes which were missed on PET/CT were of cm and subcentimeter size. It is known that PET may limit the detection of lesions less than centimeter size due to finite spatial resolution of the imaging system and due to partial volume effects.

The main strength of PET/CT, being a whole-body imaging, lies in the detection of distant metastases. This was supported by our study, which showed a SN, SP, and diagnostic accuracy of 100% for distant metastases.

The results of our study for the detection of regional nodes and distant metastases in anorectal melanoma were similar to that of the results of case series by Falch et al.,[9] who also found that PET/CT is superior for LN and distant metastases.

In our restaging cohort of 24 patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in 20 patients. PET/CT was true negative in three patients and false negative in one patient in whom liver metastases were missed.

The patient in whom PET/CT did not detect liver lesions was a FNAC-proven case of metastatic liver lesion consistent with primary from anorectum prior to PET scan. The patient was referred for PET/CT to rule out other sites of distant metastases. No other lesions were found on PET/CT. Subsequently done diagnostic triple-phase CT showed subcentimeter size enhancing liver lesions. The reason for false-negative results of PET/CT may be due to subcentimeter size of the lesion and a contrast-enhanced low-dose CT was done and not a diagnostic triple-phase CT scan.

Similar studies done in cutaneous melanoma for recurrent disease/restaging showed that PET was superior for the detection of locoregional recurrence and distant metastases with high SN and SP as compared to conventional imaging.[18],[19],[20]

Our study also revealed similar results with overall high SN, SP, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of recurrent disease. To our knowledge, this is the first study in literature which looked at the role of FDG PET/CT in initial staging and restaging of the mucosal melanomas of anorectum.

The limitations of our study include it was a retrospective analysis and the number of patients included were small. However, considering the rarity of the disease and lack of data on it, such studies are reported to strengthen the sparse existing literature. Histopathological examination of all metastatic sites was not available as this is not always feasible nor ethical in clinical practice.

 Conclusion



PET/CT demonstrates a high diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging and detection of recurrent disease in cases of anorectal melanoma. The aggressive nature and propensity to metastasize needs a whole-body evaluation making FDG PET/CT the preferred modality and one-stop imaging for anorectal melanomas.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Stefanou A, Nalamati SP. Anorectal Melanoma. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2011;24:171-6.
2Row D, Weiser MR. Anorectal melanoma. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009;22:120-6.
3Singer M, Mutch MG. Anal melanoma. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2006;19:78-87.
4Meguerditchian AN, Meterissian SH, Dunn KB. Anorectal melanoma: Diagnosis and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:638-44.
5Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1341-8.
6Siegal B, Cohen D, Jacob ET. Surgical treatment of anorectal melanomas. Am J Surg 1983;146:336-8.
7Pessaux P, Pocard M, Elias D, Duvillard P, Avril MF, Zimmerman P, et al. Surgical management of primary anorectal melanoma. Br J Surg 2004;91:1183-7.
8Ben-Izhak O, Bar-Chana M, Sussman L, Dobiner V, Sandbank J, Cagnano M, et al. Ki67 antigen and PCNA proliferation markers predict survival in anorectal malignant melanoma. Histopathology 2002;41:519-25.
9Falch C, Mueller S, Kirschniak A, Braun M, Koenigsrainer A, Klumpp B. Anorectal malignant melanoma: curative abdominoperineal resection: patient selection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul 15;14:185.
10O'Regan K, Breen M, Ramaiya N, Jagannathan J, DiPiro PJ, Hodi FS, et al. Metastatic mucosal melanoma: Imaging patterns of metastasis and recurrence. Cancer Imaging 2013;13:626-32.
11Khan M, Bucher N, Elhassan A, Barbaryan A, Ali AM, Hussain N, et al. Primary anorectal melanoma. Case Rep Oncol 2014;7:164-70.
12Li ZG, Qin XJ. Primary anorectal melanoma on FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2014;39:762-4.
13Pirenne Y, Bouckaert W, Vangertruyden G. Rectal melanoma – A rare tumour. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:756-8.
14Pfannenberg C, Aschoff P, Schanz S, Eschmann SM, Plathow C, Eigentler TK, et al. Prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in staging of advanced malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:557-64.
15Schuüle SC, Eigentler TK, Garbe C, la Fougère C, Nikolaou K, Pfannenberg C. Influence of (18) FFDG PET/CT on therapy management in patients with stage III/IV malignant melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:482-8.
16Reinhardt MJ, Joe AY, Jaeger U, Huber A, Matthies A, Bucerius J, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: Experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1178-87.
17Gao G, Gong B, Shen W. Meta-analysis of the additional value of integrated 18FDG PET-CT for tumor distant metastasis staging: Comparison with 18FDG PET alone and CT alone. Surg Oncol 2013;22:195-200.
18Schwimmer J, Essner R, Patel A, Jahan SA, Shepherd JE, Park K, et al. A review of the literature for whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with melanoma. Q J Nucl Med 2000;44:153-67.
19Stas M, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Gysen M, Hoe LV, Garmyn M, et al. 18-FDG PET scan in the staging of recurrent melanoma: Additional value and therapeutic impact. Melanoma Res 2002;12:479-90.
20Fuster D, Chiang S, Johnson G, Schuchter LM, Zhuang H, Alavi A, et al. Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma? J Nucl Med 2004;45:1323-7.