World Journal of Nuclear Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38--43

Metastatic neuroendocrine tumor with extensive bone marrow involvement at diagnosis: Evaluation of response and hematological toxicity profile of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE


Sandip Basu, Rohit Ranade, Pradeep Thapa 
 Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Sandip Basu
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Jerbai Wadia Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response and hematological toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with lutetium (177Lu)-DOTA-octreotate (DOTATATE) in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with extensive bone marrow metastasis at the initial diagnosis. A retrospective evaluation was undertaken for this purpose: Patients with NET with extensive diffuse bone marrow involvement at diagnosis who had received at least three cycles of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE were considered for the analysis. The selected patients were analyzed for the following: (i) Patient and lesional characteristics, (ii) associated metastatic burden, (iii) hematological parameters at diagnosis and during the course of therapy, (iv) response to PRRT (using a 3-parameter assessment: Symptomatic including Karnofsky/Lansky performance score, biochemical finding, and scan finding), (v) dual tracer imaging features [with somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)]. Based on the visual grading, tracer uptake in somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive bone marrow lesions were graded by a 4-point scale into four categories (0-III) in comparison with the hepatic uptake on the scan: 0 - no uptake; I - clear focus but less than liver uptake; II - equal to liver uptake; and III - higher than liver uptake]. Hematological toxicity was evaluated using National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 score. A total of five patients (age range: 26-62 years; three males and two females) with diffuse bone marrow involvement at the diagnosis was encountered following analysis of the entire patient population of 250 patients. Based on the site of the primary, three had thoracic NET (two patients bronchial carcinoid and one pulmonary NET) and two gastroenteropancreatic NET (one in the duodenum and one patient of unknown primary with liver metastasis). Associated sites of metastases included the liver (n = 5), breast (n = 1), and aortocaval nodes (n = 1). On baseline diagnostic study [68Ga-DOTANOC/TATE or the technetium (99mTc)-hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-tektrotyd (TOC)], tracer uptake in the bone marrow in all patients was Grade III. At the time of analysis, the patients received three to four cycles of PRRT and a cumulative dose of 16.1-25.6 GBq with a follow-up duration ranging 10-27 months. The response as assessed by three parameters: (i) Symptomatic: All patients (except for one) reported excellent symptomatic palliation and better quality of life with improvement of Karnofsky/Lansky scores; the single case with nonresponse had shown symptomatic response in the initial 6 months following which he had a progressive disease and death at 18 months (ii) biochemical: Three patients had shown more than 50% reduction in the serum chromogranin level, one had shown increase but had demonstrated clinical evidence of response with radiologically stable disease while the other who had shown slight increase of chromogranin A (CgA) level had shown progressive disease thereafter (iii) radiological: Three patients demonstrated partial response (on FDG-PET/CT), one patient had stable disease and one patient had progressive disease following initial clinical response. As per the NCI-CTCAE score, only one patient had persistent Grade I anemia without any deterioration with the administered dose at the time of analysis. FDG uptake in the bone marrow metastatic lesions showed no obvious FDG avidity on visual assessment except for two patients (low-grade FDG uptake). Interestingly, the associated metastatic lesions [except for patient I with Mib1 labeling index (LI): 1-2%], demonstrated high FDG avidity. Thus, we observed that the majority (in our series four out of five patients, i.e. 80%) of the patients had excellent symptomatic response with at least stabilization of the disease at a follow-up period of 10-27 months. The single patient who had a progressive disease also had a good symptomatic response in the initial 6 months from the first dose of PRRT. Despite the extensive bone marrow involvement, no hematological toxicity was observed (only one patient showed Grade I anemia), suggesting that PRRT is well-tolerated by this particular subgroup.



How to cite this article:
Basu S, Ranade R, Thapa P. Metastatic neuroendocrine tumor with extensive bone marrow involvement at diagnosis: Evaluation of response and hematological toxicity profile of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE.World J Nucl Med 2016;15:38-43


How to cite this URL:
Basu S, Ranade R, Thapa P. Metastatic neuroendocrine tumor with extensive bone marrow involvement at diagnosis: Evaluation of response and hematological toxicity profile of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. World J Nucl Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 7 ];15:38-43
Available from: http://www.wjnm.org/text.asp?2016/15/1/38/165353


Full Text

 Introduction



Bone marrow metastases from neuroendocrine tumor (NET) have been primarily reported as individual case studies; a literature search on the topic yielded only four such reports since 2009 over the last 6 years, all as case reports.[1],[2],[3],[4] With increasing use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with NET, it is imperative to assess the response of this particular subgroup to this novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) targeted therapy. Thus, we evaluated the patient characteristics, response profile, and toxicity profile (focusing primarily on bone marrow toxicity) of this particular subset of patients selected from a population of 250 patients of NET who had undergone PRRT over last 5 years in a large tertiary care center. For an appropriate assessment of treatment response and associated toxicity, we selected those patients who had received at least three cycles of PRRT. In our analysis, however, there was no patient of this particular subgroup who received less than three cycles or in whom PRRT was terminated with fewer cycles.

 Materials and Methods



This was a retrospective analysis of NET patients (a population of 250 patients treated over the last 5 years) who had undergone PRRT with lutetium (177 Lu)-DOTA-octreotate (DOTATATE) at a large tertiary care center. The patients selected for the study fulfilled the following criteria: These patients demonstrated diffuse bone marrow metastases on initial diagnostic study [68 Ga-DOTANOC/TATE or the technetium (99m Tc)- hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-tektrotyd (TOC)] and had received at least three cycles of PRRT with 177 Lu-DOTATATE.

The selected patients were analyzed under the following parameters: (i) Patient characteristics, (ii) associated metastatic burden, (iii) hematological parameters at diagnosis and during the course of therapy, (iv) response (using a 3-parameter assessment: Symptomatic including Karnofsky/Lansky performance score and biochemical and scan features), and (v) dual tracer imaging features [with somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)] and correlation with response.

Based on the visual grading, tracer uptake in SSTR-positive bone marrow lesions were graded by a 4-point scale into four categories 0-III in comparison with the hepatic uptake on the scan: 0 - no uptake; I - clear focus but less than liver uptake; II: Equal to liver uptake; III: Higher than liver uptake). With respect to associated number of metastases at other sites, the patients were subdivided into two subgroups: Group A (those patients with less than five metastases) and Group B (those with more than five target lesions at other locations). Hematological toxicity was evaluated using National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 score.

A comparative assessment was undertaken using dual tracer imaging approach between SRI and FDG-PET/CT imaging with regard to the following: (a) At the bone marrow level and (b) at the associated metastatic sites. The overall response was correlated with the imaging features.

 Observations and Results



On analyzing the entire patient population of 250 patients, it yielded a total of five patients with diffuse bone marrow involvement at diagnosis with age ranging from 26 years to 62 years; it included three males and two females. Based on the site of the primary, three patients had thoracic NET (two patients had bronchial carcinoid and one patient had pulmonary NET) and two patients had GEP-NET (one in the duodenum and one patient of unknown primary with liver metastasis) [Table 1a].{Table 1a}

Associated sites of metastases included the liver (most predominant and involved in all five patients), breast (patient III), and aortocaval nodes (patient I), in addition to the primary sites as applicable in each patient.

Cumulative dose and hematological toxicity profile

On baseline diagnostic study (68 Ga-DOTANOC/TATE or 99m Tc-HYNIC-TOC), tracer uptake in the bone marrow in all patients was Grade III [Table 1a]. With regard to the number of metastases at other sites, all patients belonged to Group B, that is, all had more than five target lesions at other sites [Table 1a]. The detailed patient- and lesion-specific histopathological characteristics have been depicted in [Table 1b].

At the time of analysis, the patients received PRRT with 177 Lu-DOTATATE of three to four cycles and a cumulative dose of 16.1-25.6 GBq [Table 2a]. The duration of follow-up ranged 10-27 months [Table 2a].{Table 2a}

As per the

NCI-CTCAE score, only one patient had persistent Grade I anemia without any deterioration with the administered dose at the time of analysis [Table 2a] and [Table 2b].

Response assessment

The response to PRRT was assessed by three parameters: (i) Symptomatic: All patients, except for one patient (Case IV), reported excellent symptomatic palliation and better quality of life including better Karnofsky/Lansky performance score (detailed symptomatic response, along with subjective description stated in [Table 3a] and[Table 3b]; the single case with nonresponse had shown response in the initial 6 months following which he had progressive disease and death at 18 months. Scan-wise, however, he had a stable disease and the death was primarily due to massive effusion and ascites consistent with extensive hepatic involvement and hypoalbuminemia; (ii) biochemical: Three patients had shown more than 50% reduction in the serum chromogranin level, one had shown an increase (patient I) but had demonstrated clinical evidence of response while the other (patient IV) who had shown a slight increase of chromogranin A (CgA) level had shown progressive disease thereafter; (iii) radiological: Three patients demonstrated partial response (on FDG-PET/CT [Figure 1], whereas SRI showed stable disease in these cases), one had stable disease [Figure 2] and one patient had progressive disease following initial clinical response.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Table 3a}{Table 3b}

SRI and FDG-PET/CT correlation

Comparison between SRI and FDG-PET/CT between the bone marrow lesions and the associated lesions at other organ sites revealed the following [Table 4]:{Table 4}

Bone marrow lesions: FDG uptake in the bone marrow metastatic lesions showed no obvious lesion on visual assessment except for patient II and patient V, who showed low-grade FDG uptake Associated metastatic lesions: Interestingly, the associated metastatic lesions, except in the case of patient I, demonstrated FDG avidity and hence, in terms of overall assessment showed partial concordance (where the associated metastatic lesions showed concordance and the bone marrow lesions were discordant with respect to tracer uptake among the two diagnostic studies). The solitary case that had a progressive disease had partial concordance.

 Discussion



PRRT with 177 Lu-DOTATOC/TATE has been a promising novel receptor targeted therapy in advanced neuroendocrine tumors that has gained substantial popularity over recent times.[5],[6] The standard guideline recommendation for PRRT includes well-differentiated Grade 1 and Grade 2 NETs [Mib1 (Ki-67) LI of up to 20 %] that express SSTR positivity, as evaluated by SRI with 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC/TATE/NOC PET-CT or 99m Tc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy or 111In-octreoscan. The recently published European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines [5] have recommended PRRT up to the upper limit of Ki-67 LI to 30%. There has been an increasing emphasis on critically exploring the various subsets of patients with NET with regard to evaluation of clinical response and the adverse effects of this therapy. Also, based on histopathological subtypes, sites of disease involvement, molecular imaging parameters, there have been endeavors toward the development of personalized model and decision-making.[7],[8],[9]

Diffuse bone marrow involvement in NET on pretreatment diagnostic study is a relatively uncommon but definitive entity that could be encountered in clinical PRRT practice. In our study, we focused to this particular subgroup with respect to the efficacy and safety of PRRT. All recruited patients received at least three cycles of therapy with 177 Lu-DOTATATE. We observed that the majority (in our series, four out of five patients, i.e. 80%) had excellent symptomatic response with at least stabilization of the disease at a follow-up period of 10-27 months. The single patient who had a progressive disease also had a good symptomatic response in the initial 6 months since the first dose of PRRT. Despite the extensive bone marrow involvement, no hematological toxicity was observed (only one patient showed persistent Grade I anemia present at the baseline), suggesting that PRRT was well-tolerated by this particular subgroup. Interestingly, a behavioral heterogeneity (by molecular imaging features) was observed between the bone marrow lesions and the associated metastatic sites that need to be further studied for its possible implications.

References

1Helbig G, Straczyńska-Niemiec A, Szewczyk I, Nowicka E, Bierzyńska-Macyszyn G, Kyrcz-Krzemień S. Unexpected cause of anemia: Metastasis of neuroendocrine tumor to the bone marrow. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2014;124:635-6.
2Post GR, Lewis JA, Hudspeth MP, Caplan MJ, Lazarchick J. Disseminated neuroendocrine carcinoma in a pediatric patient: A rare case and diagnostic challenge. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2012;34:200-3.
3Basu S, Abhyankar A. The use of 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor with atypical and extensive metastasis responding dramatically to a single fraction of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. J Nucl Med Technol 2014;42:296-8.
4Wang HY, Shabaik AS. Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma involving the bone marrow with chronic lymphocytic leukemia mimicking Richter transformation. Blood 2013;122:2776.
5Kam BL, Teunissen JJ, Krenning EP, de Herder WW, Khan S, van Vliet EI, et al. Lutetium-labelled peptides for therapy of neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39(Suppl 1):S103-12.
6Öberg K, Knigge U, Kwekkeboom D, Perren A; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii124-30.
7Bodei L, Kidd M, Baum RP, Modlin IM. PRRT: Defining the paradigm shift to achieve standardization and individualization. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1753-6.
8Basu S, Sirohi B, Shrikhande SV. Dual tracer imaging approach in assessing tumor biology and heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumors: Its correlation with tumor proliferation index and possible multifaceted implications for personalized clinical management decisions, with focus on PRRT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:1492-6.
9Kulkarni HR, Baum RP. Patient selection for personalized peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using Ga-68 somatostatin receptor PET/CT. PET Clin 2014;9:83-90.