|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 180-183
Diagnostic value of the rim sign on hepatobiliary scintigraphy
Shekhar Vinod Shikare
Department of Medicine Nuclear, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
|Date of Submission||05-Dec-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Jan-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||11-Jun-2020|
Dr. Shekhar Vinod Shikare
Al Zahra Hospital, P.O. Box 3499, Sharjah
United Arab Emirates
| Abstract|| |
The most commonly accepted pathophysiologic mechanism for the appearance of the “hot rim” sign is inflammatory changes from the gallbladder spreading to and affecting the surrounding liver. The “hot rim” sign has clinical relevance, because it is associated with a high incidence of perforated or gangrenous cholecystitis. The presence of these above-mentioned conditions increases the likelihood of complications and warrants urgent surgical evaluation. We present present the findings of on hepatobiliary scintigraphy and adjunct single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography-fused imaging in a case of acalculous cholecystitis, which has been confirmed on histopathology (marked degree of acute gangrenous cholecystitis).
Keywords: 99mTc-iminodiacetic acid scan, acalculous cholecystitis, rim sign, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography
|How to cite this article:|
Shikare SV. Diagnostic value of the rim sign on hepatobiliary scintigraphy. World J Nucl Med 2020;19:180-3
| Case Report|| |
A 33-year-old male presented with severe right upper quadrant pain associated with vomiting and fever, which was not settled with pain killers. Clinical assessment led to a suspicion of acute cholecystitis. C-reactive protein was 96 mg/L (0–10).
| Ultrasound of the Abdomen|| |
The gall bladder showed increased bladder wall thickening of about 4.6 mm with sludge inside the gallbladder cavity and a streak of fluid around the pericholecystic edema; no gallbladder stones were noted and there were no changes of acalculous acute cholecystitis.
| Computed Tomography Scan of the Abdomen With Contrast|| |
A distended gallbladder showed an enhancing thickened wall, no evidence of calculus, and significant stranding in the pericolic fat planes that extends to involve the adjacent hepatic flexure region. This may represent acalculous cholecystitis.
| 99m Tc-Mebrofenin Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy|| |
Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid dynamic images (0–58 min), static images at 60 min and 120 min, and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography-fused images at 60 min
Shows prompt and good hepatic extraction of tracer by the liver. Biliary to bowel tracer excretion was normal. The gallbladder was not visualized during the entire study.
A peripheral rim of abnormally increased tracer uptake was seen surrounding a photopenic gallbladder fossa (rim sign) throughout the study [dynamic images-[Figure 1] (arrow), static images [Figure 2] (arrow) and better appreciated in the SPECT/CT fused images ([Figure 3] and [Figure 4] (arrow)).
|Figure 1: Dynamic images of hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan showing rim sign (arrow)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Static images of hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan showing rim sign (single arrow)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images of hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan showing rim sign (arrow)|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography-fused images of hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan showing rim sign (arrow)|
Click here to view
These features favor acute cholecystitis with the presence of rim sign. The pericholecystic hepatic activity sign representing late stage of acute cholecystitis and has a high predictive value for complicated acute cholecystitis and is a harbinger of hemorrhage, necrosis of wall or gangrene, etc.
The Patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and histopathology showed features of marked degree of acute gangrenous cholecystitis.
The “hot rim” sign has been an established marker in hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) since it wasfirst reported in 1984 and the most commonly accepted pathophysiologic mechanism for the appearance of 'hot rim' sign is inflammatory changes from the gallbladder spreading to and affecting the surrounding liver., It is typically seen as a secondary, albeit more specific finding of cholecystitis. It is also a marker of disease severity, as it has an association with more severe forms of cholecystitis, such as perforated and gangrenous cholecystitis.
Typically, acute cholecystitis on HBS is seen as non-visualisation of the gallbladder after tracer uptake seen within the biliary tree. The 'hot rim sign' is independent of biliary tracer excretion and instead depends upon the inflammatory reaction of the hepatic parenchyma adjacent to the gallbladder fossa and subsequently resulting hyperemia.
The above-mentioned pathophysiologic mechanism of the “hot rim” sign proved useful in diagnosing our patient, as one of our differential considerations before additional imaging was acalculous cholecystitis. The “hot rim” sign lacks association with cases of acalculous cholecystitis, likely secondary to its pathophysiologic cause. Acalculous cholecystitis is typically due to gallbladder immotility in a critically ill patient, with subsequent ischemic insult secondary to the underlying toxic exposure of bile.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis is as follows: sensitivity of hepatobiliary scintigraphy (96%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%–97%) was significantly higher than the sensitivity of ultrasonography (US) (81%; 95% CI: 75%–87%) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (85%; 95% CI: 66%–95%). There were no significant differences in specificity among hepatobiliary scintigraphy (90%; 95% CI: 86%–93%), US (83%; 95% CI: 74%–89%), and MR imaging (81%; 95% CI: 69%–90%). Only one study about the evaluation of CT showed that sensitivity was 94% (95% CI; 73%–99%) at a specificity of 59% (95% CI: 42%–74%). The hepatobiliary scintigraphy has the highest diagnostic accuracy of all imaging modalities in the detection of acute cholecystitis, and the diagnostic accuracy of US has a substantial margin of error, comparable to that of MR imaging, whereas CT is still underevaluated.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Ziessman HA. Acute cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, and biliary leakage. Semin Nucl Med 2003;33:279-96.
Swayne LC, Filippone A. Gallbladder perforation: Correlation of cholescintigraphic and sonographic findings with the Niemeier classification. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1915-20.
Cawthon MA, Brown DM, Hartshorne MF, Karl RD Jr., Bauman JM, Howard WH 3rd
, et al
. Biliary scintigraphy. The “hot rim” sign. Clin Nucl Med 1984;9:619-21.
Owen CC, Jain R. Acute acalculous cholecystitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2005;8:99-104.
Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 2012;264:708-20.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]