Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 938  

 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 251-257

Quantitative comparison between single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging of lung ventilation with 99mTc-technegas and 68Ga-gallgas in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot study


1 Physics Institute, Sciences Faculty, UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay
2 Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinics Hospital, Medicine Faculty, UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay
3 Uruguayan Center for Molecular Imaging, CUDIM, Montevideo, Uruguay
4 Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinics Hospital, Medicine Faculty, UDELAR; Uruguayan Center for Molecular Imaging, CUDIM, Montevideo, Uruguay

Date of Submission02-May-2018
Date of Acceptance13-Jul-2018
Date of Web Publication9-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Enrique Gustavo Cuna
Dr. Américo Ricaldoni 2010, Montevideo,
Uruguay
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_45_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


The aim of this study was quantitative comparison between 68Ga-Gallgas positron emission tomography (PET) and 99mTc-Technegas single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for lung ventilation function assessment in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive pulmonary disease and to identify image-derived texture features correlating to the physiologic parameters. Five patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with PET and SPECT lung ventilation scans were selected for this study. Threshold-based segmentations were used to compare ventilated regions between both imaging techniques. Histograms of both scans were compared to reveal main differences in distributions of radiotracers. Volumes of segmentation as well as 50 textural features measured in the pulmonary region were correlated to the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as the relevant physiological variable. A better peripheral distribution of the radiotracer was observed in PET scans for three out of five patients. A segmentation threshold of 27% and 31% for normalized scans, for PET and SPECT respectively, was found optimal for volume correlation with FEV1. A high correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.9) was found between 16 texture features measured from SPECT and 7 features measured from PET and FEV1. Quantitative measurements revealed different tracer distribution in both techniques. These results suggest that tracer distribution patterns may depend on the cause of the pulmonary obstruction. We found several texture features measured from SPECT to correlate to FEV1.

Keywords: Gallgas, quantification, technegas, texture features


How to cite this article:
Cuna EG, Gambini JP, Servente L, Savio E, Engler HW, González GA, Alonso O. Quantitative comparison between single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging of lung ventilation with 99mTc-technegas and 68Ga-gallgas in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot study. World J Nucl Med 2019;18:251-7

How to cite this URL:
Cuna EG, Gambini JP, Servente L, Savio E, Engler HW, González GA, Alonso O. Quantitative comparison between single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging of lung ventilation with 99mTc-technegas and 68Ga-gallgas in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot study. World J Nucl Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 16];18:251-7. Available from: http://www.wjnm.org/text.asp?2019/18/3/251/256342




   Introduction Top


The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is clinically diagnosed with spirometry by measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). However, this measurement does not give any information about the obstructed regions in the lung. A better assessment of small airway diseases can be obtained with lung scintigraphy.[1] Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has also been incorporated for airway function diagnosis.[2]

For regional lung obstruction imaging, tomographic three-dimensional (3D) images obtained in SPECT have a clear advantage over 2D projection images obtained in scintigraphy. Technegas (Cyclomedica Ltd.) is used to assess lung ventilation function.[3] Technegas is a pseudo-gas, consisting of carbon nanoparticles suspended in argon and labeled with 99mTc. The size of carbon nanoparticles is about 100–300 nm. This allows for pulmonary ventilation imaging in nearly physiological conditions, since nanoparticles can reach the alveolar space.[2]

As an alternative to SPECT, studies have reported the feasibility and implementation of Gallgas-positron emission tomography (PET) scans for lung ventilation.[4],[5],[6],[7] Gallgas is a radiotracer made with the same carbon nanoparticles as Technegas but labeled with 68Ga. Gallium-68 is an attractive PET radionuclide due to its short half-life (~68 min), ease of production, availability, and compatibility with medical applications.[8],[9] Qualitative comparison studies between Technegas-SPECT and Gallgas-PET have been reported,[10] where Gallgas PET shows a better distribution inside the lungs providing a better visualization of ventilation heterogeneities. Other comparative studies have shown that diagnoses with Technegas-SPECT and Gallgas-PET are compatible most of the time; however, PET offers more confidence diagnosis in some cases.[6]

It is well known that PET has better spatial resolution than SPECT.[11] However, SPECT has the potential to become a more sophisticated technology through image analysis techniques.[2] On the other hand, PET is gaining relevance in diagnose of pulmonary imaging[12] and will most likely continue to be used for this purpose in the future. For these reasons, we considered a quantitative comparison between Gallgas-PET and Technegas-SPECT to be of interest.

Previous authors have investigated the feasibility of selecting obstructed lung regions in the lungs using textural features calculated from computed tomography (CT) images.[13] They found that a very good agreement with the segmentation obtained through texture features' quantification and visual assessment done by experienced physicians.

We hypothesize that quantification in both techniques is relevant for diagnostic/prognostic purposes. Moreover, advanced quantitative parameters such as texture features, measured from ventilation PET and SPECT scans, are likely to show correlations to FEV1 as the physiologic variable used to assess COPD severity.


   Subjects and Methods Top


Patients

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and all participants signed an informed consent form. For this retrospective study, five patients with appropriate nonattenuation-corrected Gallgas-PET scans and available Technegas nonattenuation-corrected SPECT scans were selected. Nonattenuation correction scans were used to compare PET to SPECT acquisition mode. All these patients had moderate-to-severe COPD and underwent Gallgas-PET scans at our center between September 2011 and July 2012. PET and SPECT scans were performed within 4 days of each other. [Table 1] shows the details for the patients.
Table 1: Details of patient cohort

Click here to view


Radiopharmaceutical production

Technetium -99m was obtained from a 99 Mo/99mTc generator. For gallium-68, an eluate from a 68Ge/68Ga generator was purified and concentrated by a QMA cartridge before production of Gallgas nanoparticles. In both cases, carbon nanoparticles were produced with a commercial device from Cyclomedica Ltd. Both radioisotopes were bound to carbon particles in a pure argon atmosphere and a temperature of 2500°C. For Gallgas, carbon nanoparticles were labeled with 68Ga as GaCl3. For Technegas, nanoparticles were labeled with 99mTc as 99mTcO4-.

Imaging

An estimated mean inhaled activity of 70 MBq for Technegas and 27 MBq for Gallgas was administered to the patients, instants before scanning. Ventilation SPECT was performed acquiring 120 images around a 360° angle, with 15 s per step. Gallgas PET/CT was performed using 2 or 3 bed positions, 3 min each, with a 64-slice multidetector CT component. Each bed position comprises 46 slices. A bed overlap of 11 slices was used (approximately 24%). Both images were reconstructed using an iterative OSEM algorithm. PET images were corrected using time of flight.

Region of interest definition

The analyzed voxels from PET and SPECT scans were limited to the pulmonary region. This region-of-interest (ROI) was segmented using the inspiration CT images and extrapolated to PET and SPECT scans. All ROIs underwent visual inspection for further verification. Trachea and main bronchus regions were removed manually from the ROI.

Image analysis

SPECT data were not corrected for attenuation, since it was acquired using a dedicated SPECT camera. To compare both imaging techniques, we used the nonattenuation-corrected PET data. SPECT scans were rigidly registered to PET using normalized mutual information maximization criteria. After rigid registration, SPECT scans data grid sizes were resampled to PET scans' data grids using nearest-neighbor interpolation method.

Volume segmentation

Threshold-based segmentation was performed by taking into account voxels with values within a fixed range from SPECT and PET scan data. Pearson's correlation coefficients between segmented volumes and FEV1 were calculated to find optimal segmentation thresholds. Voxel histograms were calculated considering voxels inside the segmented pulmonary region. For these voxels, an estimated value for background activity was calculated using the mean value of voxels from the surrounding area outside the lungs. Voxels with values lower than background were not considered for the histograms.

Texture features

Texture features were measured from PET and SPECT scans. To quantify these values, we calculated parametric maps from scans using patches. A patch is defined as a cube with N × N × N voxels (N-patch) centered in a single voxel. To obtain a parametric map, each voxel is replaced by the value of a single feature calculated inside the N-patch centered in that voxel. The final result is a 3D volume with the same size as the scan data, each parametric map corresponds to a single texture feature. In this case, we used a 5-patch size for calculations.

To assign a feature a value from a given ROI, the mean value of the corresponding parametric map voxels inside this ROI is calculated. Voxels with neighboring patches that fell outside the pulmonary region were not taken into account.

Fifty different first, second, and higher order texture features were calculated from tomographic PET and SPECT scans.

First-order features: mean (1), median (2), variance (3), coefficient of variation (4), skewness (5), kurtosis (6), energy (7), and entropy (8).[14]

Second-order features from gray level co-occurrence matrix: angular moment (9), contrast (10), correlation (11), sum of square variance (12), inverse difference moment (13), sum average (14), sum variance (15), sum entropy (16), entropy (17), difference variance (18), difference entropy (19), information measure of correlation (20 and 21), maximum correlation coefficient (22), maximal probability (23), diagonal moment (24), dissimilarity (25), difference energy (26), inertia (27), inverse difference moment (28), sum energy (29), cluster shade (30), and cluster prominence (31).[15]

High-order features using gray level run length matrix: short run emphasis (32), long run emphasis (33), gray-level nonuniformity (34), run length nonuniformity (35), run percentage (36), low gray-level run emphasis (37), high gray-level run emphasis (38), short-run low gray-level emphasis (39), short-run high gray-level emphasis (40), long run low gray-level emphasis (41), and long run high gray-level emphasis (42).[16]

High-order features using neighboring gray level dependence matrix: small number emphasis (43), large number emphasis (44), number nonuniformity (45), second moment (46), and entropy (47).[17]

High-order features using neighboring gray-tone difference matrix: coarseness (48), contrast (49), and busyness (50).[18]

Correlations between texture feature segmentation and forced expiratory volume in 1 s

Using the previously described parametric maps, we used threshold-based segmentation to divide voxels inside the lung region. We measured Pearson's correlation coefficients between the total volume of the segmented regions and FEV1 volumes, for all 50 texture features, after proper standardization of features' quantitative values. The highest Pearson's correlation coefficient was used as criteria to find optimal segmentation threshold using texture features.

Statistical comparison between texture features

Using the optimal segmentation thresholds measured from PET and SPECT, we selected the voxels inside the obstruction regions common to both techniques. Thus, we took into consideration voxels corresponding to obstructed regions for both PET and SPECT scans. We compared the mean and variance values for each texture feature from all these voxels taken from all five patients to compare SPECT and PET features.

All image analysis, quantification, and statistic tests were done using the software MATLAB release 2017a (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States).


   Results Top


Correlation coefficients between FEV1 and segmented volumes for several thresholds are shown in [Figure 1]. Maximum correlation coefficient values are obtained for a threshold of 27% of maximum uptake for PET and 31% of maximum uptake for SPECT scans, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.90 (P = 0.039) and 0.98 (P = 0.002), respectively.
Figure 1: Correlation coefficients between threshold-segmented volumes and forced expiratory volume in 1 s

Click here to view


The histograms measured for each patient, from PET and SPECT scans, and the intensity volume histograms (IVHs) are shown in [Figure 2]. IVH shows the volume in liters taking into account all the voxels with values above a given threshold as a percentage of maximum uptake. [Figure 3] shows maximum intensity projections of PET and SPECT scans limited to the lung regions for all five patients in the study.
Figure 2: Comparison between histograms of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography scans ( first column) and intensity volume histograms (second column), for each patient

Click here to view
Figure 3: Normalized voxel values positron emission tomography (top row) and single-photon emission computed tomography (bottom row) maximum intensity projection scans. Each column corresponds to scans for the same patient

Click here to view


Segmentation volumes using some of the 50 different texture features were found to show high Pearson's correlation coefficients (>0.9) when compared to FEV1 as the physiologic variable. These features, their corresponding threshold values for segmentation, together with correlation coefficients and their P values are shown in [Table 2] and [Table 3] for Gallgas-PET and Technegas-SPECT, respectively.
Table 2: Texture features used for segmentation in positron emission tomography scans for which resulting volumes show high correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 s

Click here to view
Table 3: Texture features used for segmentation in singlephoton emission computed tomography scans for which resulting volumes show high correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 s

Click here to view


Mean and standard deviation values of voxels inside obstructed lung regions were calculated from parametric maps corresponding to these features, for both Technegas-SPECT and Gallgas-PET scans. Comparison bar graphs for mean and standard deviation can be seen in [Figure 4] and [Figure 5], respectively.
Figure 4: Mean values for the features with which segmentation volumes exhibit high correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 s, inside obstructed lung regions

Click here to view
Figure 5: Standard deviations for the features with which segmentation volumes exhibit high correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 s, inside obstructed lung regions

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


FEV1 is the clinical quantitative variable generally used to assess COPD severity, this is why we used these values to find a correlation with lung ventilation volumes and thus obtain a significant threshold for segmentation in PET and SPECT scans. Optimal thresholds (as percentages of maximum voxel value) used to segment ventilation volumes were similar for PET and SPECT scans (27% and 31%, respectively). Previous studies analyzed the relationship between V/Q ratio and FEV1.[19],[20] In this case, we analyzed correlations between ventilation scans and FEV1. A correlation with a larger patient cohort between ventilation-segmented volumes and FEV1 could reveal a link between tracer distribution and this physiological uptake. Visual inspection shows that the uptake regions above this threshold correspond to what would be visually assigned to the ventilated regions of the lungs. [Figure 6] shows the ventilated regions calculated using these thresholds in the same slice of the same patient using PET and SPECT (images have been fused with CT for clarity).
Figure 6: single-photon emission computed tomography segmentation of ventilated region with a threshold of 31% over the single positron emission computed tomography scan fused with the computed tomography (a). Positron emission tomography scan segmentation of ventilated region with a threshold of 27% over the positron emission tomography fused with the computed tomography (b)

Click here to view


In an attempt to characterize tracer distribution, we plotted histograms and IVHs from PET and SPECT scans and compared them for each one of our five patients. Comparisons between histograms from PET and SPECT show similarities in some regions, but most of them show differences for a given range of voxel values. These histograms are complemented by the IVHs. Regions where histograms show more voxel counts in PET, together with the higher level of the IVH curves translate the fact that there is a better peripheral distribution of Gallgas when compared to Technegas. This is the other reason why we used nonattenuation-corrected scans, to see more peripheral distribution of the tracer in the lungs. Interestingly, even if three of the cases in this study showed the same tendency, the other two showed an opposite, yet less marked, behavior. This suggests that the radiopharmaceutical distribution could strongly depend on the cause of pulmonary disease and the used radiotracer (in pseudogas form).

Texture features are useful when they can be related and used to assess certain aspects of patient clinical data. In this case, we used textural features for threshold-based segmentations using both SPECT and PET data in the lung tissues. Textural features in the lungs have been studied as measured from CT scans.[13] To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies where textural features have been quantified using SPECT or PET scans for lung ventilation. We chose a patch size of 5 × 5 × 5 voxels, which by the voxel size accounts for 2.5 cm, as we considered this to be large enough for the features not to be greatly affected by respiratory motion. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to conduct sensitivity studies with a larger patient sample and perform gated acquisitions. The segmented volumes we obtained showed a good correlation to FEV1 volumes for 18 features in SPECT and 7 features in PET. This suggests that there are intrinsic differences between the features measured in the obstructed and ventilated uptake regions of the lungs, in both SPECT and PET, and that textural features could play an important role in lung parenchyma segmentation using these imaging modalities. Furthermore, as we can see in [Figure 4] and [Figure 5], some features exhibit similar statistical distributions in SPECT and PET scans. We think that a standardized protocol could provide more robust texture feature quantification in both techniques, as they seem to be consistent between these two scanning modalities. Although these measurements should be taken with caution as we have only a few patients, these results are encouraging to continue with similar trials.


   Conclusion Top


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing the differences between PET and SPECT using quantitative metrics other than standardized uptake value and V/Q. Taking this small cohort of patients into consideration, results suggest that tracer distributions could strongly depend on the cause of the disease. Segmentation using some texture features quantified from SPECT and PET was found to have a better correlation to physiological variable FEV1, motivating to continue the research in this field. Studies including a larger cohort of patients are necessary to have statistically significant results.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank the graduate academic commission (CAP) for supporting graduate level research.

Financial support and sponsorship

Funding from participating institutions.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Bajc M, Markstad H, Jarenbäck L, Tufvesson E, Bjermer L, Jögi J, et al. Grading obstructive lung disease using tomographic pulmonary scintigraphy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and long-term smokers. Ann Nucl Med 2015;29:91-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schembri GP, Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Freeman L. Artifacts and anatomical variants affecting ventilation and perfusion lung imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2015;45:373-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jögi J, Jonson B, Ekberg M, Bajc M. Ventilation-perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-DTPA versus technegas: A head-to-head study in obstructive and nonobstructive disease. J Nucl Med 2010;51:735-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Alonso O, Gambini JP, Balter H, Nuñez M, Savio E, Paolino A, et al. PET lung ventilation scanning with gallium-68 aerosol (Galligas) versus technegas SPECT in patients with obstructive lung disease: A feasibility study. J Nucl Med 2012;53:2502.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kipritidis J, Siva S, Hofman MS, Callahan J, Hicks RJ, Keall PJ, et al. Validating and improving CT ventilation imaging by correlating with ventilation 4D-PET/CT using 68Ga-labeled nanoparticles. Med Phys 2014;41:011910.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hofman MS, Beauregard JM, Barber TW, Neels OC, Eu P, Hicks RJ, et al. 68Ga PET/CT ventilation-perfusion imaging for pulmonary embolism: A pilot study with comparison to conventional scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1513-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kotzerke J, Andreeff M, Wunderlich G, Wiggermann P, Zöphel K. Ventilation-perfusion-lungscintigraphy using PET and 68Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Nuklearmedizin 2010;49:203-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Decristoforo C. Gallium-68 – A new opportunity for PET available from a long shelf-life generator – Automation and applications. Curr Radiopharm 2012;5:212-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dolovich MB, Bailey DL. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessing aerosol deposition of orally inhaled drug products. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2012;25 Suppl 1:S52-71.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Borges JB, Velikyan I, Långström B, Sörensen J, Ulin J, Maripuu E, et al. Ventilation distribution studies comparing technegas and “Gallgas” using 68GaCl3 as the label. J Nucl Med 2011;52:206-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spanoudaki VC, Ziegler SI. PET & SPECT Instrumentation. München: Springer; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Oehme L, Zöphel K, Golgor E, Andreeff M, Wunderlich G, Brogsitter C, et al. Quantitative analysis of regional lung ventilation and perfusion PET with (68)Ga-labelled tracers. Nucl Med Commun 2014;35:501-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chabat F, Yang GZ, Hansell DM. Obstructive lung diseases: Texture classification for differentiation at CT. Radiology 2003;228:871-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973;3:610-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tang X. Texture information in run-length matrices. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998;7:1602-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Sun C, Wee WG. Neighboring gray level dependance matrix for texture classification. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1982;23:341-52.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Amadasun M, King R. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1989;19:1264-74.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Le Roux PY, Siva S, Steinfort DP, Callahan J, Eu P, Irving LB, et al. Correlation of 68Ga ventilation-perfusion PET/CT with pulmonary function test indices for assessing lung function. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1718-23.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Le Roux PY, Siva S, Callahan J, Claudic Y, Bourhis D, Steinfort DP, et al. Automatic delineation of functional lung volumes with 68 Ga-ventilation/perfusion PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2017;7:82.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed585    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded88    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal