Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 412  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-35

Evaluating cardiac hypoxia in hibernating myocardium: Comparison of 99mTc-MIBI/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography-computed tomography in relation to normal, hibernating, and infarct myocardium


Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sandip Basu
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Jerbai Wadia Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_16_18

PMID: 30774543

Rights and Permissions

The aim of this prospective study was to explore the feasibility of 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of cardiac hypoxia in patients of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and to compare the uptake pattern with that of 99mTc-MIBI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). Twenty-six patients suffering from IHD were evaluated in this study. The patients initially underwent 99mTc-MIBI rest/stress myocardial perfusion imaging and 18F-FDG cardiac PET/CT as a part of their routine cardiac imaging. Patients with hibernating myocardium on these scans further underwent 18F-FMISO Cardiac PET/CT. Controls were also considered in the form of patients with scarred and normal myocardium. On visual assessment, increased 18F-FMISO uptake was noted in the hibernating myocardium compared to scarred or normal myocardium. On semiquantification analysis, there was overlap in the uptake values with a range of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in hibernating, scarred, and normal myocardium being 0.8–2.2 g/dl, 0.7–1.8 g/dl, and 0.7–1.6 g/dl, respectively. On individual patient-specific comparison in subjects harboring both hibernating and scarred myocardium, it was observed that SUVmaxof 18F-FMISO in hibernating myocardium was highest, followed by scarred myocardium and normal myocardium, respectively. The ratio of 18F-FMISO SUVmaxof hibernating to the normal myocardium in these subjects was always more than 1, and never less than the ratio of SUVmaxof scarred to normal myocardium. Thus, in this mixed population study, it was observed that on an individual patient basis, hypoxic myocardium consistently showed higher 18F-FMISO uptake than surrounding scarred and normal myocardium. The ratio of 18F-FMISO SUVmaxof hibernating to normal myocardium was higher than the ratio of scarred to the normal myocardium in all patients. On overall basis, however, there was considerable overlap in the SUV values among hibernating, scarred, and normal myocardium resulting in difficulty in differentiation of these entities with FMISO cardiac PET.18F-FDG cardiac PET/CT remains the standard and superior method to determine hibernating myocardium in patients of IHD due to its superior contrast. The limitation of FMISO is poor signal to noise ratio because of high background uptake from the blood pool. Cardiac PET/CT with superior hypoxia tracers needs to be further examined for imaging cardiac hypoxia.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed343    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded55    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal