Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 810  

 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 196-199

Can neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio be a predictor for bone metastases of solid tumors?


Department of Nuclear Medicine, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey

Date of Web Publication31-Aug-2016

Correspondence Address:
Billur Caliskan
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu - 14210
Turkey
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.174711

PMID: 27651741

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Cancer-associated inflammation has been receiving increased attention due to its role in cancer development. It is known that tumors can cause an inflammatory reaction and inflammatory cells play an important role in neoplastic growth. In this study, we aimed to investigate any relationship between bone metastases and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Patients who were referred for bone scintigraphy to investigate bone metastasis were enrolled in the study. Patients' hematological parameters were obtained from the hospital database retrospectively. Patients with a nonmetastatic bone scan were categorized as Group A (N = 171), patients who had metastatic bone disease without any other organ metastases were categorized as group B (N = 25), and patients who had metastatic bone disease with the other organ metastases were categorized as Group C (N = 48). The median NLR of the patients in Group A was 2.55 (range: 0.38-20.7), in Group B was 2.83 (range: 1.56-31.8), and in Group C was 4.12 (range: 1.79-38). NLR was significantly higher in Group C patients compared to Group A and B patients (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the NLR is significantly associated with the other organ metastases but has no significant correlation with bone metastases.

Keywords: Bone metastasis, bone scintigraphy, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), solid tumor


How to cite this article:
Caliskan B, Korkmaz AN. Can neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio be a predictor for bone metastases of solid tumors?. World J Nucl Med 2016;15:196-9

How to cite this URL:
Caliskan B, Korkmaz AN. Can neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio be a predictor for bone metastases of solid tumors?. World J Nucl Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 9];15:196-9. Available from: http://www.wjnm.org/text.asp?2016/15/3/196/174711


   Introduction Top


Bone metastasis of various neoplasms affects patients' quality of life as well as their morbidity and mortality. Bone scintigraphy is generally used to detect bone metastasis in most cancers including breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and gastrointestinal system cancer. Although bone scintigraphy has a high sensitivity for detecting bone lesions, it has limitations in determining if bone lesions are benign or malignant. Other imaging modalities such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) or a NaF bone scan may be suggested, but these modalities are not cost-effective and they are also not suitable in most centers. Recently, some hematological indices, such as neutrophil counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) have been investigated and introduced as prognostic indicators in cancer patients. [1] The tumor's inflammatory response plays an important role in the development and survival of tumor cells. [2] NLR is determined as a hematological inflammatory marker that can be measured easily in the peripheral blood of patients. NLR has been associated with the prognosis of cancers of the colorectal region, lungs, breasts, and pancreas. [3],[4],[5],[6] Wang et al. reported that NLR was an independent prognostic factor in patients with bone metastasis. [7] Consequently, we aimed to investigate whether NLR can be used as a predictor for bone metastasis before they appear on bone scintigraphy. We also wanted to show any relationship between NLR, hematological parameters, and bone scintigraphy findings.


   Materials and Methods Top


Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained for performing this study. Patients who were referred for bone scintigraphy between January 2012 and December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 267 patients with histologically verified primary malignancy as solid tumors, who were referred for bone scan to evaluate bone metastasis. Patients were categorized into three groups based on metastatic bone disease with or without the other organ metastases. Twenty-three patients with suspicious metastatic bone disease were excluded from the study. Complete blood counts (CBC) of all patients obtained within the same week of the bone scan date were obtained from medical records. Patients with chronic inflammatory disease and hematological disease were excluded from the study, as were patients who had been using antiinflammatory medications and those who had no blood count data.

Patients received an intravenous injection of 740-925 MBq technetium-99m ( 99m Tc) methylene diphosphonate (MDP). Approximately 3 h later, they underwent a whole-body planar image in the anterior and posterior views on a dual-headed gamma camera (Siemens; e-cam signature, USA) fitted with a low-energy, all-purpose, parallel-hole collimator. The photopeak of 99m Tc was 140 keV with a 15% pulse height analyzer window. Planar spot images and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images were added for certain patients whenever deemed necessary. SPECT was reconstructed using an iterative reconstruction method in which a Gaussian filter was implemented. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians interpreted bone scintigraphy scans. Patients with suspicious bone lesions were interpreted as metastatic disease only when a correlation with other radiological modalities could be identified. Patients were divided into three groups as follows: Group A had nonmetastatic bone scans, Group B had metastatic bone scans without any other organ metastases, and Group C had metastatic bone scans with other organ metastases.

Hematological parameters, including hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count, were analyzed 30 min after blood collection using an automatic blood count system. The NLR was then calculated.

A statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All normally distributed data were analyzed using unpaired sample t-tests. A comparison of the nonnormal numerical variables was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


The 244 subjects who were enrolled in this study were aged 28-90 years. Scintigraphy was normal in 147 patients, but 24 patients' scintigraphy results were suggestive of degenerative changes corroborated with PET/CT and other radiological findings. Patients' characteristics are given in [Table 1].
Table 1: Characteristics and diagnosis of the patients


Click here to view


NLR was significantly increased in patients with bone metastasis with other organ metastasis compared to the patients without bone metastasis and the patients with only bone metastasis (P < 0.001) [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The box and whisker plot showing distrubutions of NLR for groups

Click here to view


Median neutrophil counts were 4.6 (range: 1.0-42.1) in Group A, 4.9 (range: 3.1-10.8) in Group B, and 6.2 (range: 1.9-44.4) in group C (P = 0.003). The median lymphocyte count of Group C was lower from that of Group B and Group A (1.4, 1.6, and 1.7 respectively; P = 0.004). WBC counts were higher in Group C than in Group A and Group B (10.8, 7.4, and 7.0 respectively; P = 0.026) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Hematological parametres of groups

Click here to view


There was no correlation between the number of metastatic bone lesions and NLR in groups B and C.


   Discussion Top


The results of our study demonstrate that there is a relationship between metastatic disease and some hematological indices. When we compared the patients with normal bone scan and the patients with metastatic bone disease, we found that the NLR was slightly higher in the group of metastatic bone disease. However, the NLR of patients with bone metastases accompanied with other organ metastases was also significantly higher than that of the normal patients As mentioned above, neutrophil counts were higher and lymphocyte counts were lower in patients with bone metastasis and the other organ metastases. It is well known that there is a relationship between systemic inflammation and tumor development. [2],[8],[9] Although it is not clearly understood which mechanisms cause this relationship, some theories have been suggested. Tumor-related inflammation may cause direct or indirect increases in cytokines, inhibition of apoptosis, and increases in angiogenesis. [2],[8] Tumor cells release granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) that can trigger neutrophilia. Neutrophils play a role in tumor angiogenesis by producing proangiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase, interleukin-8, and elastases. [1],[2],[8],[10] These types of cytokines promote tumor growth, development, and metastasis. On the other hand, lymphocytes are important in providing antitumor immunity. [11] Increased lymphocytes have also been reported to be a good prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. [12],[13],[14] Both increased neutrophil counts and decreased lymphocyte counts can be a cause for increased NLR. In our study, neutrophil counts were significantly higher in patients with bone metastasis and other organ metastases, and also, lymphocyte counts were slightly lower in patients with bone metastasis and other organ metastases. Current studies have reported that NLR is a prognostic predictor for many types of cancer. Paramanathan et al. reported in a systemic review and meta-analysis that an elevated NLR correlated with poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. [1] Unal et al. investigated the effects of the pretreatment NLR on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and found that the overall survival rates were significantly associated with NLR. [4] They also found there was no significant relationship between chemoradiotherapy and NLR. Thus, the effect of inflammation on survival seemed independent from the response to chemoradiotheraphy. Another study reported that multiple myeloma patients with a NLR ≥ 2 at diagnosis were associated with worse outcomes compared with patients with a NLR <2. [15] Wang et al. reported that the prognosis of patients with malignant bone metastasis was independently associated with NLR; they found that a high NLR (>3) was associated with a poor prognosis. [7]

Bone scintigraphy is commonly used for detection of bone metastasis in many types of cancers including cancers of the prostate, breasts, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Most metastatic bone lesions are asymptomatic and there is controversy about whether asymptomatic cancer patients should be scanned. There is a propensity of scanning asymptomatic patients with tumors that may metastasize to bones from areas such as the breasts, lungs, and prostate. On the other hand, tumors with low rates of bone metastases such as tumors from the colon, head, neck, and nasopharyngeal region could be out of preference for scanning in a cost-effective approach. In this study, we showed that there is a relationship between metastatic disease and NLR. Although it is more obvious that the other organ metastases are related with increase of NLR, the patients with only bone metastases showed a slight increase on NLR. Thus, it is still controversial if NLR can help the clinician make decisions about scanning asymptomatic cancer patients.

The limitations of this study include the relatively small numbers of patients and the wide range of various cancer types. Inflammation markers can also increase with certain inflammatory diseases and another limitation of our study was that we did not take into account this condition because it was a retrospective study. Further studies need to be performed to confirm our results. A large prospective study can demonstrate whether NLR can help to distinguish malignant and benign bone lesions. In conclusion, a high NLR is significantly associated with metastatic disease but it is not associated with only metastatic bone disease.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of intrest.

 
   References Top

1.
Paramanathan A, Saxena A, Morris DL. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of pre-operative neutrophil lymphocyte ratio on long term outcomes after curative intent resection of solid tumours. Surg Oncol 2014;23:31-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002;420:860-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, Zhang JF, Wang WL, Zhu Y, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2014;134:2403-13.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Unal D, Eroglu C, Kurtul N, Oguz A, Tasdemir A. Are neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte rates in patients with non-small cell lung cancer associated with treatment response and prognosis? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:5237-42.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Noh H, Eomm M, Han A. Usefulness of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting disease-specific survival in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer 2013;16:55-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Szkandera J, Stotz M, Eisner F, Absenger G, Stojakovic T, Samonigg H, et al. External validation of the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker on a large cohort of pancreatic cancer patients. PloS One 2013;8:e78225.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Wang S, Zhang Z, Fang F, Gao X, Sun W, Liu H. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic indicator in patients with bone metastasis. Oncol Lett 2011;2:735-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 2001;357:539-45.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436-44.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Kusumanto YH, Dam WA, Hospers GA, Meijer C, Mulder NH. Platelets and granulocytes, in particular the neutrophils, form important compartments for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis 2003;6:283-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Kitayama J, Yasuda K, Kawai K, Sunami E, Nagawa H. Circulating lymphocyte is an important determinant of the effectiveness of preoperative radiotheraphy in advanced rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2011;11:64.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Ogino S, Nosho K, Irahara N, Meyerhardt JA, Baba Y, Shima K, et al. Lymphocytic reaction to colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival, independent of lymph node count, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:6412-20.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe Dg, Macmillan RD, Grainge MJ, Lee AH, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1949-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Clemente CG, Mihm MC Jr, Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Collini P, Cascinelli N. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 1996;77:1303-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Kelkitli E, Atay H, Cilingir F, Güler N, Terzi Y, Ozatlý D, et al . Predicting survival for multipl myeloma patients using baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Ann Hematol 2014;93:841-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2364    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal