Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 463  

 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 50-55

Comparative Study of Radionuclide Uptake Levels between Primary and Metastatic Bone Tumors


1 Department of Medical Physics, School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Centre for Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
3 Department of Medical Physics, School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana; Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana

Date of Web Publication12-Aug-2014

Correspondence Address:
Hasford Francis
Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box LG 80, Legon, Accra
Ghana
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.138575

PMID: 25191113

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Study on 95 patients to compare radionuclide uptake levels in patients undergoing bone scintigraphy at a Nuclear Medicine Unit has been performed quantitatively using Image J software. Patients were administered with activity ranging from 0.555 to 1.110 MBq depending on their body weight, and their whole-body bone scans obtained with an installed e.cam single-photon emission computed tomography system. Matrix size of 256 × 1024 was used in acquiring the scintigrams. Quantitative analyses performed with installed Image J software revealed higher radionuclide uptake levels in metastatic tumors compared with primary tumors for all selected skeletal parts. Average normalized count of activity in metastatic tumors was 37.117 ± 27.740 cts/mm 2 /MBq and its corresponding uptake in primary tumors was 23.035 ± 19.542 cts/mm 2 /MBq. The relative higher uptake in metastatic tumors over primary tumors could be attributed to higher osteoblastic activity and blood flow in metastatic tumors.

Keywords: Counts of activity, diagnosis, metastatic tumor, primary tumor, quantitative assessments, radionuclide, scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography, therapeutic


How to cite this article:
Huguette YY, Kwame KA, Kojo WI, Francis H, Kwabla SE, Otoe AA. Comparative Study of Radionuclide Uptake Levels between Primary and Metastatic Bone Tumors. World J Nucl Med 2014;13:50-5

How to cite this URL:
Huguette YY, Kwame KA, Kojo WI, Francis H, Kwabla SE, Otoe AA. Comparative Study of Radionuclide Uptake Levels between Primary and Metastatic Bone Tumors. World J Nucl Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 5];13:50-5. Available from: http://www.wjnm.org/text.asp?2014/13/1/50/138575


   Introduction Top


A nuclear medicine procedure uses Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) for diagnostic evaluation of patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic conditions of the bones. [1],[2] Bone scans for diagnosis of skeletal disorders constitute the most popular application of radionuclide imaging. Bone scintigraphy is a valuable tool not only for early diagnosis, but also to localize and quantify muscular involvement in the disease. Furthermore, it is useful in monitoring therapeutic responses. [3],[4],[5] Bone scintigraphy is a highly sensitive diagnostic procedure, widely available, and relatively inexpensive method for diagnosing many skeletal disorders. The greatest strength of the radionuclide scan relates to its ability to provide early physiologic information about the involved bone and to evaluate multiple areas in a single, relatively rapid examination. Improved imaging techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and three-phase scanning, coupled with quantitative assessments of scintigrams, have improved scintigraphy's diagnostic specificity and accuracy for many bone examinations. [6],[7],[8]

Bone scintigraphy is a very sensitive analytical modality, which depends ultimately on the ability of the nuclear medicine physician to interpret the image obtained after scanning the patient. It is in this area that the subjectivity of the physician impacts on the outcome of the patient's diagnosis. Hence, it would be desirable to adopt measures of decreasing as much as possible the physician's subjectivity in the interpretation of the scan. However, some few works have been done by Mettler et al., [9] Jones et al., [10] Thrall et al., [11] Ludwig et al., [12] Subramanian et al., [13] and others on radionuclide bone scintigraphy in nuclear medicine.

Quantitative approaches are being employed to determine the relative differences in levels of radionuclide uptake between primary and metastatic bone tumors. This calls for the application of credible quantitative assessment tools such as Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, United States of America) [14] which is freely available and operates on a range of platforms such as Windows, Mac, and Linux for image processing. The approach will in general aid in developing mechanisms that rely not so much on how the physician sees the bone scan, but on the physical evidence provided by data captured in the image.

The application of Image J to the analysis of the uptake will allow for accurate interpretation of bone scintigrams in both primary and metastatic bone tumor conditions. Like other quantitative analytical tools, Image J enhances not only diagnostic value but therapeutic effects in nuclear medicine. In addition to being readily available for no cost on image website, Image J is supported by a wide range of constantly evolving user-created functionalities to address a remarkable range of applications, complementing commercial software that typically comes with imaging instruments. By performing quantitative analysis, better attention is paid to detail, and hence better diagnostic outcomes are produced. The primary objective of this study is to quantitatively assess radionuclide uptake levels in primary and metastatic bone tumors for patients undergoing scintigraphic procedures. The uptake levels are characterized by the number of counts in specific regions of interest (ROI) in the scintigrams.


   Materials and Methods Top


The e.cam single-photon emission computed tomography system

The primary equipment employed in obtaining bone scintigrams for this study was the Siemens e.cam SPECT system (Siemens Medical Solutions Inc, Valley Stream Parkway, USA). The equipment is connected to a computer system, which displays acquired images. [Figure 1] shows the process through which images are obtained. The SPECT system is equipped with a low energy all purpose collimator during bone scans.
Figure 1: System of image acquisition using e.cam single-photon emission computed tomography system

Click here to view


Acquisition of bone scintigrams

Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate was prepared in the hot laboratory of the Nuclear Medicine Unit and intravenously administered to patients immediately after preparation. Anterior and posterior whole-body planar images were acquired three hours after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. Administered activity typically ranged from 0.555 to 1.110 MBq depending on a patient's weight and age. Patients were made to drink four to six glasses of water between the time of injection and time of image acquisition to aid in rapid clearance of radioisotope from the bladder. A 256 × 1024 matrix size was used in acquiring the bone scintigrams. The acquired images were displayed in grayscale for a resident nuclear medicine physician's interpretation and diagnosis.

[Figure 2] displays anterior-posterior views of a patient's scintigram saved in joint photographic experts group format. The scintigrams were retrieved from the database of the Nuclear Medicine Unit and analyzed in terms of radionuclide uptake levels using Image J software.
Figure 2: Whole-body bone scintigram of a patient showing multiple hot spots

Click here to view


Image J software

Image J, a comprehensive image quantitative analytical tool, was installed on a Dell Vostro 1014 Laptop (Dell Computers Corporation, Round Rock, Tx, USA) computer. Image J software is a digital imaging program, which displays, edits, analyzes, processes, saves, and prints images. The software also supports standard image processing functions such as contrast manipulation, sharpening, smoothing, edge detection, median filtering and thresholding, histogram generation, and profile plots. [14],[15],[16]

Assessment of radionuclide uptake levels

Pathologic whole-body bone scintigrams of 95 patients acquired with the Siemens e.cam SPECT system between 2007 and 2012 were retrieved for this study. For ethical reasons, patients were coded with ID numbers instead of their names. [Appendix A] [Additional file 1] shows data on patients sampled for this study.

Hot spots on the sampled scintigrams representing pathologic conditions were identified and classed either as primary or metastatic bone tumors by a resident nuclear medicine physician. For the purposes of this study, selection of hot spots were restricted to nine skeletal parts namely cranium, neck, sternum, shoulder, ribcage, vertebra, knee, femur, and sacrum due to their dominance over hot spots recorded in other skeletal parts.

Hot spots in the mandible, hip, and ankle were excluded in the selection criteria. Mandibular hot spots were all diagnosed as dental diseases and not bone pathology. All hot spots in the hip were metastatic in nature, while hot spots in the ankle were all primary in nature, hence comparative assessments of primary and metastatic uptakes in those regions could not be possible.

The sampled scintigrams were imported into Image J software in succession and analyzed by drawing ROI over observable hot spots (tumor sites). Oval selection tool was employed in drawing the ROIs because bone tumors usually have oval or rounded shapes, [17],[18],[19] and hence best approximation is achieved with this tool. Counts of activity for selected ROIs were generated in Image J for each patient, and recorded in excel spread sheet for analyses. For each identified tumor site, counts of activity for both anterior and posterior views were generated from Image J, and the geometric mean count (GMC) estimated using eq. (1). The counts of activity (i.e. the GMCs) for the tumor sites were then normalized relative to the respective area of ROI and injected activity. The normalized geometric mean counts (nGMC), which give an indication of the radionuclide uptake level, were estimated using Eq. (2).



The estimated normalized counts, referred to as radionuclide uptake level in this paper, were grouped into the various skeletal parts and average values calculated as shown in [Table 1]. Differences in primary and metastatic uptake levels for the nine skeletal parts were analyzed.
Table 1: Percentage difference between metastatic and primary uptake

Click here to view


Standard deviation or root mean square error estimates were performed using eq. (3).



where is the mean of n sampled values.


   Result and Discussion Top


[Table 2] shows the uptake levels (nGMCs) for the nine selected body parts. Tumor sites in the studied patients varied in number. Some patients recorded single tumor sites, while others recorded multiple sites. From the 95 studied patients, four (i.e. 042, 045, 067 and 072) recorded single tumor sites in their scintigrams, while five (i.e. 003, 032, 037, 038 and 052) recorded two tumor sites on their scintigrams. The rest of the patients had three or more tumor sites in the body.
Table 2: Average normalized uptakes for the selected body parts

Click here to view


[Figure 3] indicates the number of patients in each of the nine categories of analyzed skeletal parts. Except for neck, knee and sacrum categories, metastatic tumors dominated over primary tumors in all other categories. A total of 271 tumors from the 95 patients were considered in the analyses, resulting in an average of 2.9 tumors per patient. For the studied population, bone tumors detected in the shoulder region was the most dominant with 23.6% and tumors in the sacrum were least with 1.5%. Metastatic tumors made up 64.6% of all detected bone tumors, while primary tumors made up 35.4%. This observation corroborates similar observation by Hasford et al. [20] that bone tumors with their origin in cells of the bone itself are less prevalent compared with those that metastasize from other parts of the body.
Figure 3: Number of patients in the respective bone tumour categories

Click here to view


Counts of activity

[Table 2] summarizes the counts of activity for the selected body parts. The normalized counts of activity in the metastatic and primary tumors were 37.117 ± 27.740 cts/mm 2 /MBq and 23.035 ± 19.542 cts/mm 2 /MBq, respectively for the entire patient population.

All nine skeletal parts considered in the study show high counts of activity in metastatic tumors compared to the primary tumors. The higher a radionuclide uptake level, the higher its corresponding count of activity and vice versa. Hence from results of the study, metastatic bone tumors are seen to have higher radionuclide uptake level compared with primary bone tumours [Figure 4]. This observation could be attributed to the mechanism of Tc-99m MDP uptake, which is directly related to blood flow and degree of osteoblastic activity. Bony metastatic disease results in carcinomatous osteodysplasia, referring to histologic alteration, resulting in a variable increase in osteoblasts, osteoclasts, blood vessels, and other stromal tissues. [21] The resultant effect is an increased activity in a bone scan.
Figure 4: Normalized counts of activity in the studied patient population

Click here to view


Difference in uptake levels

The percentage differences between counts of activity in metastatic and primary bone tumors are estimated in [Table 1]. Highest percentage difference is observed in the neck with 53.3% and the least difference in the femur with 24.4%. The radionuclide uptake level in the metastatic tumors was estimated to be 37.9% more than uptake in the primary tumors in the entire patient population. The study has proved a significantly higher uptake of Tc-99m MDP in metastatic cases than in primary cases using a quantitative approach.


   Conclusion Top


Comparative assessment of radionuclide uptake levels has been performed using Image J software on patient scintigrams. The study has revealed higher uptake of activity in metastatic bone tumors compared with primary tumors. The higher uptakes in metastatic cases have been attributed to the mechanism of Tc-MDP uptake, which is directly related to blood flow and degree of osteoblastic activity. Quantitative assessment of bone scintigrams is recommended due to its relatively high accuracy in diagnosing tumors.


   Acknowledgement Top


This work was performed using bone scintigrams retrieved from the database of the Nuclear Medicine Unit of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana. The authors acknowledge with gratitude the support from this Unit.

 
   References Top

1.O′Reilly PH, Shields RA, Testa HJ. Nuclear Medicine in Urology and Nephrology. 2 nd ed. London: Butterworths and Co.; 2000. p. 2-4, 233-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Zaidi H. Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging. New York, USA: Springer; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Otsuka N1, Fukunaga M, Ono S, Nagai K, Morita K, Tomomitsu T, et al. Visualization of soft tissue by technetium-99m MDP in polymyositis. Case reports. Clin Nucl Med 1988;13:291-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Lim ST, Sohn MH, Park SA. Tc-99m MDP three-phase bone scintigraphy in disciplinary exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:558-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Bar-Sever Z, Mukamel M, Harel L, Hardoff R. Scintigraphic evaluation of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis with Tc-99m MDP. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:1013-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Lurye DR, Castronovo FP Jr, Potsaid MS. Improved method for quantitative bone scanning. J Nucl Med 1977;18:1069-73.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Bombardieri E, Aktolun C, Baum RP, Bishof-Delaloye A, Buscombe J, Chatal JF, et al. Bone scintigraphy procedure guidelines for tumour imaging, September 2, 2003. Available from: http://www.eanm.org/publications/guidelines/gl_onco_bone.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 05].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.McNeil BJ. Rationale for the use of bone scans in selected metastatic and primary bone tumors. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:336-45.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Mettler FA Jr, Guiberteau MJ. Nuclear Medicine Imaging. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia, USA: W. B. Saunders Company 1998. p. 207-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Jones AG, Francis MD, Davis MA. Bone scanning: Radionuclide reaction mechanisms. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:336-45.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Thrall JH, Geslien GE, Corcoron RJ, Johnson MC. Abnormal radionuclide deposition patterns adjacent to focal skeletal lesions. Radiology 1975;115:659-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Ludwig H, Kumpan W, Sinzinger H. Radiography and bone scintigraphy in multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol 1982;55:173-81.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Subramanian G, McAfee JG, Blair RJ, Kallfelz FA, Thomas FD. Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate - A superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes. J Nucl Med 1975;16:744-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Collins TJ. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques 2007;43 1 Suppl: 25-30.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Burger W, Burge M. Digital Image Processing: An Algorithmic Approach Using Java. New York, USA: Springer; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Dougherty G. Digital Image Processing for Medical Applications. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Ghasemi A, Hiradfar AA, Pedram M. An epidemiologic study of ewing sarcoma family at SHAFA Hospital in Khozestan Province-IRAN, a referral children cancer treatment center. Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol 2012;1:24-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Kemal B, Haydar D, Þule C, Övgü A, Gülben EH, Meltem O, et al . Giant cell tumour-like lesion of the urinary bladder: A report of two cases and literature review; giant cell tumour or undifferentiated carcinoma? Diagn Pathol 2009;4:48.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Li S, Siegal GP. Small cell tumors of bone. Adv Anat Pathol 2010;17:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Hasford F, Amuasi JH, Sosu EK, Nani K, Sackey TA, Boadu M, et al. Radionuclide Tc-99m MDP imaging for diagnosis of bone tumours at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (Ghana) - An illustrative review. J Appl Sci Technol 2010;15:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Bader DA, Nagel JS. Bone scintigraphy in multiple myeloma, 1995. Available from: http://www.med.harvard.edu/JPNM/TF94_95/Jan17/WriteUpJan17.html. [Last accessed on 2013 May 13, 06:10:31 GMT].  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Estimation of kidney and bladder radionuclide activity for patients undergoing bone scan
Luc T. Bambara,Augustine K. Kyere,Francis Hasford,Edem K. Sosu,Isaac K. Wilson
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2015; 8(3): 317
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Result and Discu...
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgement
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1380    
    Printed42    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded206    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal